Sure, here is the information excluding the title, introduction and conclusion:
House Democrats’ recent call for an investigation into alleged misconduct by Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz’s is the latest in a series of controversial Department of Justice (DOJ) actions under Biden’s administration.
The DOJ has faced scrutiny for its handling of Gaetz’s case, with critics suggesting that the probe is politically motivated. In April, anonymous sources leaked details about the ongoing investigation into Gaetz’s possible involvement in sex trafficking, breaking the department’s norm of not commenting on ongoing investigations.
The Gaetz controversy is one among several questionable DOJ actions under Biden’s presidency. Critics have, for instance, highlighted Biden’s decision to keep Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss in place in order to continue the investigation into Hunter Biden, the president’s son. This has raised concerns about possible conflicts of interest.
Further, the DOJ under Biden has faced allegations of political bias – particularly in relation to several high-profile investigations and prosecutions.
The targeting of former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, a keen Trump supporter, for alleged campaign finance violations, drew outrage from Republican supporters who called the DOJ’s actions politically motivated. Similarly, the department’s investigation of former Trump advisor Steve Bannon was also viewed by some as evidence of political bias.
Yet, the DOJ under Biden has also made several contentious decisions related to civil liberties that have sparked controversy on both sides of the political spectrum. For example, the decision to continue with the prosecution of Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, for alleged espionage has raised eyebrows among both Democrats and Republicans.
Overall, Biden’s DOJ has proven to be quite controversial, with critics arguing that the department is essentially serving as a political tool. This is a significant departure from the traditional role of the DOJ, which is to ensure justice is done in a fair and impartial manner. The accumulation of these controversies may end up influencing public perception of the DOJ going forward.